Interpretation of the Application Model

Application Model Overview

Along its evolution, OpenHarmony has provided two application models:

  • Feature Ability (FA) model. This model is supported by OpenHarmony API version 7 and 8. It is no longer recommended.

  • Stage model. This model is supported since OpenHarmony API version 9. It is recommended and will evolve for a long time. In this model, classes such as AbilityStage and WindowStage are provided as the stage of application components and windows. That's why it is named stage model.

The stage model is designed based on the following considerations, which make it become the recommended model:

  1. Designed for complex applications

    • In the stage model, multiple application components share an ArkTS engine (VM running the programming language ArkTS) instance, making it easy for application components to share objects and status while requiring less memory.
    • The object-oriented development mode makes the code of complex applications easy to read, maintain, and scale.
  2. Native support for cross-device migration and multi-device collaboration at the application component level

    The stage model decouples application components from User Interfaces (UIs).

    • In cross-device migration scenarios, after the system migrates application component data or status between devices, it can use the declarative feature of ArkUI to restore the UI based on the data or status saved in the application components.

    • In multi-device collaboration scenarios, application components can initiate Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) and support interaction with cross-device application components.

  3. Support for multiple device types and window forms

    Application component management and window management are decoupled at the architecture level. This decoupling makes it:

    • Easy to tailor application components. For example, windows can be tailored for devices without screens.

    • Easy to extend the window forms.

    • Possible for application components to use the same lifecycle on multiple devices (such as desktop devices and mobile devices).

  4. Well balanced application capabilities and system management costs

    The stage model redefines the boundary of application capabilities to well balance application capabilities and system management costs.

    • Diverse application components (such as service widgets and input methods) for specific scenarios.
    • Standardized background process management. To deliver a better user experience, the stage model manages background application processes in a more orderly manner. Applications cannot reside in the background randomly, and their background behavior is strictly managed to minimize malicious behavior.

Differences Between the FA Model and Stage Model

In the stage model, multiple application components share the same ArkTS engine instance. In the FA model, each application component exclusively uses an ArkTS engine instance. This is their biggest difference. In the stage model, application components can easily share objects and status while requiring less memory. Therefore, you are advised to use the stage model when developing complex applications in distributed scenarios.

The table below describes their differences in detail.

Table 1 Differences between the FA model and stage model

Item FA model Stage model
Application component 1. Component classification
fa-model-component
- PageAbility: has the UI and supports user interaction For details, see PageAbility Component Overview.
- ServiceAbility: provides background services and has no UI. For details, see ServiceAbility Component Overview.
- DataAbility: provides the data sharing capability and has no UI. For details, see DataAbility Component Overview.
2. Development mode
Application components are specified by exporting anonymous objects and fixed entry files. You cannot perform derivation. It is inconvenient for capability expansion.
1. Component classification
stage-model-component
- UIAbility: has the UI and supports user interaction. For details, see UIAbility Component Overview.
- ExtensionAbility: provides extension capabilities (such as widget and input methods) for specific scenarios. For details, see ExtensionAbility Component Overview.
2. Development mode
The object-oriented mode is used to provide open application components as classes. You can derive application components for capability expansion.
Process model There are two types of processes:
1. Main process
2. Rendering process
For details, see Process Model Overview (FA Model).
There are three types of processes:
1. Main process
2. ExtensionAbility process
3. Rendering process
For details, see Process Model Overview (Stage Model).
Thread model 1. ArkTS engine instance creation
A process can run multiple application component instances, and each application component instance runs in an independent ArkTS engine instance.
2. Thread model
Each ArkTS engine instance is created on an independent thread (non-main thread). The main thread does not have an ArkTS engine instance.
3. Intra-process object sharing: not supported.
For details, see Thread Model Overview (FA Model).
1. ArkTS engine instance creation
A process can run multiple application component instances, and all application component instances share one ArkTS engine instance.
2. Thread model
The ArkTS engine instance is created on the main thread.
3. Intra-process object sharing: supported.
For details, see Thread Model Overview (Stage Model).
Mission management model - A mission is created for each PageAbility component instance.
- Missions are stored persistently until the number of missions exceeds the maximum (customized based on the product configuration) or users delete missions.
- PageAbility components do not form a stack structure.
For details, see Mission Management Scenarios.
- A mission is created for each UIAbility component instance.
- Missions are stored persistently until the number of missions exceeds the maximum (customized based on the product configuration) or users delete missions.
- UIAbility components do not form a stack structure.
For details, see Mission Management Scenarios.
Application configuration file The config.json file is used to describe the application, HAP, and application component information.
For details, see Application Configuration File Overview (FA Model).
The app.json5 file is used to describe the application information, and the module.json5 file is used to describe the HAP and application component information.
For details, see Application Configuration File Overview (Stage Model).